| Clients | Vezne 24 and Pratik İşlem |
|---|---|
| Sector | Fintech |
| Scope | .NET Core financial transaction infrastructure, third-party API integrations, ongoing in-team development support |
| Technologies | .NET Core, third-party API integrations |
About the Project
For Vezne 24 and Pratik İşlem we developed a.NET Core-based financial transaction infrastructure and integrated it with third-party services. We did not simply deliver the project and walk away. We continue to provide active support to the software teams within their day-to-day development flow. In financial transaction infrastructure, a system that works quickly, reliably and in harmony with external services is a direct part of the service offered to the user. For that reason the work is progressing less as a one-off delivery and more as a collaboration that grows the infrastructure together with the client’s own teams.
The Need and the Problem Solved
As financial transaction volume grew, a more robust and integrated software infrastructure was needed. The increase in the number of transactions required the infrastructure to be reconsidered so that it could carry not only today’s load but also future services and growth. In financial systems, when the number of transactions rises, structures that were sufficient at the start can begin to struggle in terms of both performance and integration. The goals were:
- Building an infrastructure that can carry growing transaction volume
- Putting integration with third-party services on an orderly footing
- Supporting the development flow of the existing software teams
Our Solution
The work consists of three main components:
- Financial system infrastructure: the core layer where transactions are processed and recorded. This layer was designed for growing transaction volume; the aim is that it can be extended when the load increases without the system having to be rewritten.
- Third-party API integrations: enable the financial system to exchange data with external services securely and in a controlled way. In finance, it is critical that these integrations handle error cases correctly, so that a transaction is neither left incomplete nor processed twice.
- Active in-team development support: brings the infrastructure we built and the client’s own software teams into the same flow; new needs are met together with the teams and in line with the existing architecture.
In-team development support helps the infrastructure to be used correctly in daily work and to keep improving. As the knowledge of the team that first built the infrastructure is shared with the client’s teams, new developments can move forward without departing from the architecture. Integrations are the points where the system talks to the outside world. Designing these points in an orderly way ensures that the rest of the system is not affected when one of the services changes or a new service is added.
Technologies Used
- .NET Core: the core of the financial system infrastructure
- Third-party API integrations: data exchange with external services
Process
The steps below summarize the general order we follow in financial infrastructure projects of this kind:
- Analysis: in projects of this type, the points where the existing structure is struggling and the external services the system needs to talk to are identified.
- Design: the infrastructure is designed with growing transaction volume taken into account from the start; integration points are separated from the core layer.
- Development: the.NET Core-based infrastructure and the integrations are developed in the same flow as the client’s software teams.
- Go-live and ongoing support: in this project, development support continues after delivery; needs such as a new service integration or a change in business rules are met in a way that fits the existing architecture.
Results and Benefits
By designing the infrastructure for growing transaction volume, we enabled the move to a faster, scalable and integrated financial transaction infrastructure. Continued development support helps to preserve the scalability goal not only at the initial setup but throughout the life of the system. The lesson we took from this project: on the fintech side, scalability cannot be added later.
Vezne 24 and Pratik İşlem are among the clients with whom we use the service model based on the SLA and reporting structure that we also apply in the TurkStream Pipeline project.
Discuss a Similar Project
If you want to scale your financial system or integrate it with external services, take a look at our custom software development and IT outsourcing services. See also our Coinone case study for fintech mobile work. Let’s talk about your project: tell us what you need and we will prepare a written proposal covering scope, timeline and cost. Call us on +90 850 335 10 87, message us on WhatsApp, email info@360-soft.com or use our contact page. You can also browse our other case studies.
This case study is a localized version of our reference page in Turkish: Türkçe.
